Sorry SOS…Disagree!

Disclaimer: This article comes with a warning. The warning is that there will be those that disagree with me, and they have that right, but I will not tolerate those that disagree by name-calling or that I have no idea. Come at me with rational arguments, not diatribe of irrelevant musings that are based on emotion and not rationale.


Social media and the media, in general, have gone ablaze with the interview on SEN with Stephen Silvagni, ex-list manager of Carlton. I listened with interest, that turned to anger. I was not angry at the Club but SOS himself, and the more I thought about it, I got angrier and angrier.


SOS’s statements regarding how the club treated him is pure and merely sour grapes and all about him. He stated that Mark Loguidice told him that he had tried to fight for him to keep his position. He said that Cain Liddle, who has brought in more memberships this year than in our history, that Cain was scared that he would sabotage the club as a List Manager. The hosts of the show never had the “balls” to delve in deeper to those statements. So, let’s go through it.

In the interview, he had told the club that he was thinking of leaving either at the end of his contract or this year. He stated that he was told that his contract would not be renewed because it was “complex.”

Statement of fact here – no person, no matter who they think they are, will ever be subjective when it comes to their offspring in an organization, never. People in the medical profession don’t treat family as their objectivity can be clouded by emotion; same scenario here.


SOS stated that he wanted to clear the record straight and tell us, the supporters what the club wasn’t willing to say. Here I say, what a hypocrite. When interviewed on Footy Classified in the past, SOS brushed aside questions that didn’t suit him; same scenario here except that he made a statement that worked for him. Herein lies the issue. The comments are HIS perspective and his alone, and there is an underlying agenda attached to them.


So, let’s take this a bit further. The SEN hosts had the chance to ask relevant questions about this notion of Cain Liddle’s view that SOS could sabotage the club. I agree, and here is why. If SOS was still around and given the fact that we have reduced list sizes, would he have delisted Ben? Would he have been able to let him go? Given how he carried himself today, he probably wouldn’t answer that. Would he have kept an untried and rather lazy player over another player who may be untried, but puts their heart and soul into a game? He cannot be objective in this matter, because it would mean that the Coach has wanted this player gone, but the list manager, being who he is, would disagree.


That is sabotage because he is putting the personal connection above the needs and the requirements of the club, and what a position to be in, when you are a prominent person at a club, and you have to justify keeping a player, your son, when in any other club or circumstance, he would have been let go.


Then there is Jack. If SOS tries to convince Jack to leave because of the way SOS has been treated, then this again shows the hand of sabotaging the club.


He must be brave enough to distance himself from the club in all facets and allow his son to make his own decision without the looming presence of his father and accept that decision. If not, then he is sabotaging not only his son’s career but the club as well.


I would have had more respect for a great player of this club, if he had just answered the questions about his leaving the club, in the same way he did when grilled on Footy Classified. I have no respect for him now. He is putting his own agenda above that of his professed love for the club. He is putting his needs above that of his son still at the club, Jack.


For some fans, they have said that it was time someone put some clarity on SOS’s dismissal. Why? Because of his surname? Because of who he is? Why now? SOS has not said anything previously, otherwise, why would he not of said it before? There is a hidden agenda here for SOS, he is pushing his own agenda, putting his own son in danger. I just hope Jack has the strength to push that aside and look at his needs, for I believe he has the ability to be a great player and one that is not under the constant shadow of his father.


Sorry SOS, but this interview was for you and you alone, showing how you harbor bitterness and sour grapes instead of letting it go and look at what is going to be best for your sons, not you. Respect gone!

#ALLOFUS!

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2020/10/20/stephen-silvagni-slams-blues-ceo-cain-liddle-over-club-departure/

6 thoughts on “Sorry SOS…Disagree!

  1. Interesting that Cain Liddle gets the accolades for increasing membership or was it the fact the club is finally on the path to success. Do You think if we were going backwards that membership would still increase like it has.
    Fathers all around the country have been part of football teams where there son plays. Yes sometimes it works sometimes it doesn’t
    Mostly it works so i do disagree
    Further to this SOS is the list manager not picking the side each week.
    Not the senior coach or assistant
    He also removed himself from picking his sons and let his staff decided on that supposedly.
    Looking at what sos achieved while at the club and from the hand he was dealt he made something from nothing.
    I give him a thumbs up for that.
    It was handled poorly again by the club just like the last few appointments.
    Sour grapes on all sides and why wouldn’t sos be when he was kicked first.
    I think we all now know JSOS won’t be at the club in 2021.

    Like

    1. I agree it was handled poorly. No SOS doesn’t pick the side but he has a huge influence in shaping the list. With list sizes reduced would he have done nothing if Ben was going to be delisted? I do think Jack will be at the club…

      Like

      1. That’s a list managers job is to influence the teams make up so the coach has the men to win games / right mix etc.
        The picking of teams and influencing men individually isn’t in his scope of his work.
        The talk from old Caro is where this beat up has come from.
        Another club legend stabbed in the back
        When it didn’t need to happen.

        Like

  2. Hidden agenda? I think he was just open and honest about how he felt. He versions of events. Nothing to be angry about here, just clearly didn’t have a good working relationship with Cain Liddle. I dont think there’s alot to see here, other than an honest open interview in which we all want more of from the industry.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s